Skip to Content

LA Federal Judge Blocks Law Banning Masks for Immigration Agents

PHOTO: Protests erupt in New York City after Ice raids Chinatown, Photo Date: 10/22/2025
The Mirror
PHOTO: Protests erupt in New York City after Ice raids Chinatown, Photo Date: 10/22/2025

LOS ANGELES (KESQ) - A Los Angeles federal judge today blocked California from enforcing a new law limiting when federal agents can wear masks while engaged in deportation operations, but upheld a second law requiring local, state and federal law enforcement personnel to display their name or badge number while on duty.   

Senior U.S. District Judge Christina Snyder rejected the Trump administration's claim that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents need to wear masks to prevent doxing, meaning the online disclosure of agents' personal information that could lead to harassment or targeting.

However, the judge said in her rulin California's No Secret Police Act appears to discriminate against the federal government because the law's provisions do not apply to state or local law enforcement officers.

Snyder wrote that the act ``treats federal law enforcement officers differently than similarly situated state law enforcement officers.''   

But the judge upheld the No Vigilantes Act, a separate new state law which requires most local, state and federal law enforcement personnel to display their name or badge number while on duty.

The laws, passed by the Legislature and signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom, came in response to the Trump administration's illegal immigration raids in Southern California in the summer, during which masked, unidentified federal officers detained people as part of the president's mass deportation program.

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said the state laws were unconstitutional and endanger federal officers.

The U.S. Department of Justice sued California, Newsom and state Attorney General Rob Bonta in September, challenging what the federal government claims is an ``unconstitutional'' attempt to impede federal law enforcement by imposing the mask ban and identification requirement on officers.  

The laws made California the first state in the nation to prohibit federal law enforcement, including agents of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, from hiding their identities, and requiring non-uniformed federal law enforcement to visibly display identification information, including agency, name or badge number during enforcement duties.   

Snyder, a nominee of President Bill Clinton, heard the DOJ's arguments for a preliminary injunction that aims to pause the laws.   

The laws took effect Jan. 1, but are not being enforced while their constitutionality is challenged in court.

"A federal court upheld California's law requiring federal agents to identify themselves -- a clear win for the rule of law,'' Newsom said in a statement Monday. "No badge and no name mean no accountability. California will keep standing up for civil rights and our democracy."  

The judge's ruling allows legislators to rewrite the No Secret Police Act without an exemption for state law enforcement. Newsom has not said whether he would sign a revised version of the bill.  

The DOJ lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles federal court, alleges that the No Secret Police Act and the No Vigilantes Act threaten the safety of officers facing harassment, doxing and violence while carrying out enforcement duties.   

The DOJ also says the laws violate the Constitution's Supremacy Clause, under which states have no power to control the operations of the federal government.

"Law enforcement officers risk their lives every day to keep Americans safe, and they do not deserve to be doxed or harassed simply for carrying out their duties,'' Bondi said in a statement when the lawsuit was filed in November. "California's anti-law enforcement policies discriminate against the federal government and are designed to create risk for our agents. These laws cannot stand.''

The Trump administration's complaint states that the federal government does not intend to comply with the challenged laws.

Article Topic Follows: California

Jump to comments ↓

City News Service

BE PART OF THE CONVERSATION

News Channel 3 is committed to providing a forum for civil and constructive conversation.

Please keep your comments respectful and relevant. You can review our Community Guidelines by clicking here

If you would like to share a story idea, please submit it here.