Decision to release grand jury report delayed in Palm Springs corruption case
A decision on whether the grand jury report will be released in the case of a former Palm Springs mayor and two developers will be postponed until January 17.
At the Larson Justice Center in Indio on Friday, Judge Harold Hopp expressed that more time was needed to determine if there is any evidence that is inadmissible in the trial of Steve Pougnet, John Wessman, and Richard Meaney.
Pougnet, 56, and developers Richard Hugh Meaney, 53, and John Elroy Wessman, 80, were indicted in August after the case was presented to a grand jury by the Riverside County District Attorney’s Office.
None of the defendants appeared in court Friday.
Pougnet was indicted on 21 counts, including perjury, public corruption and conflict of interest, while Meaney and Wessman were each indicted on multiple counts of bribery of a public official and conspiracy.
In September, Wessman’s attorney, David Greenberg, filed a motion to keep the grand jury transcripts under wraps based on concerns that reporting the content would be akin to “adding gasoline to a smoldering fire,” intensifying attention to a level that would hinder the defendant’s ability to receive an impartial adjudication of the charges against him.
Pougnet’s and Meaney’s attorneys joined the motion, which Superior Court Judge Harold Hopp will consider as part of a trial-setting conference Friday morning at the Larson Justice Center.
In Greenberg’s filing, he emphasizes the high-profile nature of the case and the need to preclude “prejudicial press coverage” that could put witnesses in the spotlight and contaminate the prospective jury pool, creating a “reasonable likelihood of harm to Wessman’s ability to receive a fair trial.”
The filing goes on to criticize the District Attorney’s Office for a “one-sided” presentation of evidence that resulted in the indictments, and it stresses that if the transcripts go public, the slanted details could dash any hope of finding an unbiased panel to sit in judgment.
The D.A.’s answer to the motion to seal challenges the defense to prove how unsealing the transcripts would undermine the defendants’ ability to receive a fair trial.
Prosecutors had originally filed criminal complaints against the three men in February 2017 in connection with the alleged influence-buying scheme. But after numerous delays in bringing the matter to a preliminary hearing, District Attorney Mike Hestrin decided to seek an indictment and thereby expedite proceedings, negating the need for a hearing to determine whether a trial was justified.
Palm Springs Mayor Robert Moon was joined by City Council members Geoff Kors, Christy Holstege, Lisa Middleton and J.R. Roberts in issuing a statement on Aug. 16, saying they were “pleased” with the grand jury review.
“The grand jury came to the same conclusion that the district attorney previously came to, issuing indictments against the former mayor and developers John Wessman and Richard Meaney,” the statement reads. “As a result, a trial should now proceed more expeditiously through our criminal justice system. Each of us was elected after the events that led to the indictments occurred, and we are proud of the work our council, staff and resident-led task force have done to enact and implement new, ethics and transparency laws and policies that far exceed the requirements of state and federal law, making Palm Springs a leader in open government.”
The developers are accused of paying Pougnet around $375,000 between 2012 and 2014 to vote and speak favorably when their development projects came up before the city council. Pougnet left office at the end of 2015.
Projects specified in court documents were The Dakota, the Desert Fashion Plaza, The Morrison and Vivante.
Payments to Pougnet were allegedly drawn directly from accounts maintained by Meaney’s Union Abbey Co. and Wessman Development Inc.
If convicted as charged, Pougnet could face more than 19 years in state prison, and his co-defendants could each face 12 years behind bars.
The men are free on bond.