Skip to Content

Judge rules against Gov. Newsom in lawsuit challenging executive order


A State Superior Court judge ruled against Governor Gavin Newsom in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of his executive orders.

Judge Sarah Heckman ruled that Newsom's executive No. N-67-20 was indeed unconstitutional.

The order required that all California residents registered to vote in the Nov. elections receive vote-by-mail ballots. The order also required one voting place per 10,000 residents be available from Oct 31 to Nov 2 for at least 8 hours.

Click Here to View Newsom's Executive Order No. N-67-20

As part of Heckman's ruling, she also issued a permanent injunction preventing Newsom from making further unconstitutional orders.

The lawsuit was brought about by California Assemblymembers James Gallagher (R-Yuba City) and Kevin Kiley (R-Rocklin).

"We've been arguing that the California Emergency Services Act does not provide for one-man rule. Today, the court agreed with us," Gallagher and Kiley said. "This is a victory for separation of powers. The Governor has continued to create and change state law without public input and without the deliberate process provided by the legislature. Today, the judicial branch again gave him the chack that was needed and the Constitution requires."

The court's decision does not impact the 2020 election protocols.

Click Here to View the Complete Ruling

The ruling does not affect the Governor's stay-at-home orders, as local State Senator Melissa Melendez pointed out.

The judge found the California Emergency Services Act itself to be constitutional, and made it clear that Newsom "has the authority, necessary in emergencies, to suspend statutes and issue orders to protect Californians," he said in a statement.

Heckman’s decision will become final in 10 days unless Newsom’s attorneys can raise new challenges.

Newsom’s administration is evaluating its next steps and strongly disagrees with the order’s specific limitations, said spokesman Jesse Melgar.

It’s the second time a judge in the county has reached the same conclusion, which runs counter to other state and federal court decisions backing the governor’s emergency powers. An appeals court quickly stayed the earlier order in June.

Stay with News Channel 3 for any updates.

Article Topic Follows: California

Jump to comments ↓

Jesus Reyes


News Channel 3 is committed to providing a forum for civil and constructive conversation.

Please keep your comments respectful and relevant. You can review our Community Guidelines by clicking here

If you would like to share a story idea, please submit it here.

Skip to content