Skip to Content
News

Federal Judge Overturns California’s Proposition 8

A federal judge issued his ruling in a landmark case, overturning a ban on same-sex marriage.

Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker overturned the voter-approved ban known as Proposition 8, according to the court’s e-filing website.

His verdict comes in response to a lawsuit brought by two same-sex couples and the city of San Francisco seeking to invalidate the law as an unlawful infringement on the civil rights of gay men and lesbians.

Let us know what you think. Leave a comment below, and we may use it on-the-air on News Channel 3

Proposition 8, which outlawed gay marriages in California five months after the state Supreme Court legalized them, passed with 52 percent of the vote in November 2008 following the most expensive campaign on a social issue in U.S. history.

Still, gay marriage will not be allowed to resume in the state as the judge decides whether his order should be suspended while proponents pursue their appeal. Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker has ordered both sides to submit written arguments by Friday on the issue.

In Wednesday’s ruling, Walker says the ban, “does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite-sex couples are superior to same-sex couples.”

Supporters argued the ban was necessary to safeguard the traditional understanding of marriage and to encourage responsible childbearing.

The case could eventually land before the U.S. Supreme Court to decide if gays have a constitutional right to marry in America.

Attorneys on both sides have said an appeal was certain if Walker did not rule in their favor. The case would go first to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals then the Supreme Court if the high court justices agree to review it.

Anticipating such a scenario, lawyers for the coalition of religious and conservative groups that sponsored Proposition 8 in 2008 filed a legal brief Tuesday asking Walker to stay his decision if he overturns the ban so same-sex couples could not marry while an appeal was pending.

“Same-sex marriages would be licensed under a cloud of uncertainty, and should proponents succeed on appeal, any such marriages would be invalid,” they wrote.

Walker presided over a 13-day trial earlier this year that was the first in federal court to examine if states can prohibit gays from getting married without violating the constitutional guarantee of equality.

Supporters argued the ban was necessary to safeguard the traditional understanding of marriage and to encourage responsible childbearing.

Opponents said that tradition or fears of harm to heterosexual unions were legally insufficient grounds to discriminate against gay couples.

KESQ News Team

Comments

Leave a Reply